PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Performance management is a process by which managers and
employees work together to plan, review and monitor an employee's work
objectives and overall contribution to the organization. It is the process of
creating a work environment or setting in which people are setting to perform
to the best of their abilities. Performance management is a well-constructed
work system that begins when a job is specified as needed.
Source: www.clearpointstrategy.com
Performance management is ongoing
process, it involves a process of setting goals and objectives, observing
performance, and giving and receiving ongoing coaching and feedback. Performance
management requires that managers ensure that employees’ activities and outputs
are aligning with the organization’s goals and, consequently, help the organization
gain a competitive advantage. Performance management therefore creates a direct
link between employee performance and organizational goals and makes the
employees’ contribution to the organization explicit. (Aguinis, 2013)
Performance management
is a vital feature of organizational effectiveness, because it is the key
process through which work is accomplished, it is considered as a weakness of
managing human capital and should therefore be a top priority of managers. (Gruman
and Saks, 2011)
Performance management is
concerned about aligning an individual to organizational objectives and
encouraging individuals to sustain corporate core values, empowering
expectations to be characterized and concurred in terms of role responsibilities,
accountabilities, skills and practices. It is also more concerned on providing opportunities
for individuals to recognize their objectives and
develop their competencies and skills.
Performance management assumed
that performance appraisal is the same thing as performance management. Performance appraisals can be characterized as the
formal assessment and rating of individuals by their managers at or after a
review meeting. It has been discredited because of the fact that too often it
has been operated as a top-down and to a great extent bureaucratic system
possessed by the HR department rather than by line managers. (Armstrong, 2009)
INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES
Ball Corporation supplies metal packaging to customers worldwide,
they concluded that it could improve plant performance by instituting an
improved process for setting goals and for ensuring that the plants leaders’
mind-sets and behaviors were in sync with these goals. Toyota Motors, Camry plant supervisors’ don’t sit with
individual employees to fill out forms and appraise them. Instead, teams of
employees monitor their own results. TRW supplies automotive steering, braking, and safety and
electronic equipment to customers worldwide. Top management decided it needed a
new company-wide performance management system to help bring what TRWs
employees were doing into synch with the firms new strategic goals. (Dessler,
2012)
CONCLUSION
Performance
management is a means of getting better results by providing the means for
individuals to perform well within an agreed outline of planned goals,
standards and skill requirements. Advantages of performance management to organizations
on the assumption that individuals will probably react positively and will
probably work to enhance their performance and develop their abilities in the
event that they share in the processes of defining expectations and reviewing performance
and competency against those expectations, and are engaged in creating and implementing
plans for developing their competences and skills. (Armstrong and Taylor,
2014)
REFERENCES
Aguinis, H. (2011) Performance Management, 3rd edn. Boston:
Pearson.
Armstrong, M. (2009) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management
Practice, 11th edn. London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S. (2014) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource
Management, 13th edn. London: Kogan Page.
Dessler, G. (2014) Human Resource Management, 13th edn. Boston:
Pearson.
Gruman,
J. A. and Saks, M. (2011) ‘Performance Management and Employee Engagement’,
Human Resource Management Review, 21, pp. 1-11.

Good article. Font colours in the article are vary. Please maintain a common font colour in the blog body.
ReplyDeletetopic is clearly explained.
ReplyDeletecontent is matching with the topic, pay more attention on flow of facts, good job
ReplyDeletewell structured article. points are very clear. good job
ReplyDeletecontent is ok. please pay attention on font colour and size
ReplyDeleteexcellent write-up. well structured.
ReplyDeleteGood structure and flow of essay, language style is excellent, referencing is very good congratulations very good,
ReplyDeleteWell structured essay.. Good job..
ReplyDelete