ORGANIZATION DESIGN
Organizations are spending more time and giving
more importance on strategically approaching organizational design because of
the global market consumers fluctuating expectations. The careful assessment of
how an organization operates in order to merge with an overall mission and
goals results in positive outcomes for people, systems and the
incorporation of technology.
Source: www.astronsolutions.net
Organization design is the process of
choosing how organizations should to be structured in terms the ways in which
the responsibility for carrying out the overall task is distributed to individuals
and groups of people and how the relationships between them function. The point
is to ensure that individuals work successfully together to achieve the overall
purpose of the organization. HR experts can contribute to organization design or
redesign activities by utilizing their understanding of the factors affecting
organizational behavior and their knowledge into the business as a whole. (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014)
Organization design is not important
to determine in detail the organization structure and the duties of every employee.
If an organization can develop its own process of operating and change that as
circumstances require, at that point it will be required just to detail the basic
and most critical aspects. This way to deal with organization design is called minimum
critical specification. (Huczynski
and Buchanan, 2007)
Progressively, social and
psychological relationships inside the organization are perceived as being critical
in determining the flow of significant value creation, prompting an attention
on the management of the subjective intellectual abilities of the individual to
satisfy the objective needs of organized production of goods and services. In
this process, even as hierarchies in the organizational pyramid have tended to become
flatter over time, the techno-social interactions inside and between its
diverse layers have come to display an interesting variety. (Mahesh and Suresh,
2009)
INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES
IBM,
today there are eight goto- market channels to reach customers and various
departments to manage the relationships with channel partners and customers. Procter
& Gamble embedded these new dimensions throughout its existing structure,
thus creating massive new complexity and inter dependencies. At Monsanto,
business units are run by a general manager combination of a bio scientist and
a sales/marketing person. (Galbraith, 2012)
CONCLUSION
or
The days of the top-down hierarchical
organization are gradually reaching an end, but changing the organization structure
is just a little piece of the progress to a network of teams. The larger, more
important and more urgent part is to change how an organization actually works.
This is the right time to challenge traditional organizational structures,
empower teams, hold people responsible, and focus on building a culture of
shared information, vision, and direction. (McDowell et al., 2016)
REFERENCES
Armstrong, M. and Taylor, S. (2014) Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource
Management, 13th edn. London: Kogan Page.
Galbraith,
J. R. (2012) ‘The Future of Organization Design’, Journal of Organizational
Design, 1(1), pp. 3-6.
Huczynski, A. A. and Buchanan, D. A.
(2007) Organizational Behaviour,
6th edn, Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.
Mahesh,
K. and Suresh, J. K. (2009) ‘Knowledge Criteria for Organization Design’, Journal
of Knowledge Management, 13(4), pp. 41-51.
McDowell,
T., Agarwal, D., Miller, D., Okamoto, T. and Page, T. (2016) ‘Organizational Design:
The rise of teams’, Global Human Capital Trends 2016, pp. 17-25.

well structured and good referencing
ReplyDeleteWell structured with example .Keep up the good work
ReplyDeleteWell explained article, good references..
ReplyDeleteGood essay with related examples..
ReplyDeleteGood job with more recent references
ReplyDelete